Improving the quality of research through personalization and self-reflection finish

Improving the quality of research through personalization and self-reflection finish IntroductionScientific investigation remains the essence of science. But what leads to good scientific investigation of research results in order to leave an outstanding legacy and impact on the world? Of course it is necessary that research, the most penetrating reach. Examples of this type of research is the search for Nobel Prizes. During the consultation ask what they want to see young people in terms of research with the Nobel prizes? Ciechanover, Hershko, Gross, Jelinek, Wilczek, Buck, Axel and Chauvin? The answers may summerised as:? Try to ask the important question;   ? Investigate something new;   ? Study something you are fascinated or obsessed;   ? Think about what nature shows;   ? Independent thought;   ? Focus on things that do not? T understand how an individual;   ? Don? T is the things that are in the mainstream of research and   ? The process of fulfillment.The above, there is a clear indication that researchers should strive for something that is a personal conce that the bears and the novel features, authenticity and completeness. This course, in the words of Zion and Slezak (2005) is much more difficult task to perform inquiry.PurposeThe purpose of this article is to deduce the general lines of research that may be offered to researchers the quality of research results are based on opinion of leading scientists in world.Literature review following the advice of Nobel laureates of the research is based on a review of literature, to translate the concepts in general education research principles.1. Examine what new obsession, and that researchers: Personal interestNovelty often discovered by examining the other side of the coin of the popular search. Knowledge of the search can then be progressively developed over time, focusing on details of any work being read, the appropriate conclusions and to identify inconsistencies.   Amara and Landry research, which researchers and companies that provide access to a greater variety of sources of information, improves the possibility of novelty in research.2. Think Independent: Autonomous inquiryTo his independent thought, this means that researchers should be in a constructive way in research, either individually or in groups and be able to influence decisions regarding the content and direction of research. However, according to Zion and Slezak (2005) must be based on the principles of? Planfulness? in research, the ability to intealize the assessment, openness to experience, flexibility in approach and autonomy in defining the objectives of the research and selection of appropriate methods to conduct the investigation. Another condition is that the researcher should be the initiation of disciplinary proceedings literate. The better the researcher dominate the disciplinary aspects of field of study, the better the chance for a good inquiry.3. Think about what nature shows: critical reflection and reflective thinking is required in terms of what to believe, what to do and if the results were reasonable. If you get unexpected results, the researcher must look for other possible explanations can be found. This can, inter alia, improved investment in infrastructure already in place for the implementation of sophisticated investigation and to explore answers to the literature or from other researchers and experts in the field. However, if the results were unexpected because of an error of approach, remains the task of researchers to investigate if things went wrong and then repeat the search in order to guarantee reliable data obtained.To on what the nature reveals critical steps are all research-study, according to which the benefits of research may be assessed. When all the targets in the search for what the scientists to explore new areas of scientific discovery are the opening and how it could be the company in general. In addition, research targets are met in full and the program is still on track? It 'also important to determine whether the researchers to support and broaden your search or to examine the source of know-how to realize the full potential of research.4. Continue the process of meeting: CompletenessTo guide to complete the research requires a commitment to personal and professional, for better or worse (Bus, 2004), as they have set in motion a process of discovery, validation, testing, the relevance and adequacy. Too often, researchers stopped too early, before the real breakthrough is made. Perhaps, for the last two terms, the suitability and importance, which often play a major role in determining the potential state of research, are under planning and implementation of the research project. The adequacy of research in the field of Hobaek later (2006) a? The ability to be used by people in a simple and effective?. In this context, the researcher should be to questions like:? The results are sufficiently accurate to be used by others;   ? If the results are complete enough to be understood by other users;   ? Are the quality of the results of this nature that others would use it? And   ? Will the potential users have confidence in the correctness of the results? Importance of research is usually determined by (Bus, 2004):? The plane on which the scientific research in and contribute to the traditional scientific tradition of the discipline in terms of ethics, speech, and leisure;   ? The plane, on the results and conclusions are validated and verified by an increasing number of investigations and dynamic models and methods;   ? The systemic manner in the literature to support the search for information and research results and   ? The originality and novelty of the research, because it opens new and better ways to understand and research understanding.ConclusionWinning largely depends on the new discoveries, research and added value for society in general. Under the assumption that researchers master the skills and research methodology, focusing on the personalization of research interest, independent thinking, critical reflection on the discourse of research and ensure that the research has met all the requirements of completeness, can be hard to improve the quality and value of research programme.BibliographyAmara, N. & Landry, R. 2005. Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the statistics on innovation in 1999 in Canada. Technovation. 25:245-259. Bus, H. 2004. Four dimensions of significance: Tradition, method, theory, originality. Computers and Composition. 21:5-13. Hobaek, K. 2006. The current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research. Inteational Joual Human-Computer Studies. 64:79-102. Numprasertchai, S & Igel, like 2005. Knowledge management through collaboration: more case studies of management in university laboratories in Thailand. Technovation. 25:1173-1182. Sion, M. & Slezak, M. 2005. It takes two to tango: In dynamic inquiry, the self-student acts in conjunction with the host teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education. 21:875-894. Grundling January is the director of the Center for Entrepreneurship, Tshwane Universityof Technology, South Africa.