Meditations Joshian ie Super Ultra Modern Meditations

Meditations Joshian ie Super Ultra Mode Meditations   In my philosophical jouey (and believed to have demystified the majority of the greatest mysteries of the universe) I have now with a revolutionary idea. Two crazy ideas for my arrival, the ideas, which ultimately connected with the idea of creation. 1. I can not deny the need to establish for each aspect / element of the non-eteal universe, ie the shape of the universe (generally known as material) that are not logically necessary. However, they are unable to denial inevitably leads me to the idea of ultimate creation, the idea of the cancellation, I can not deny it. 2nd Now I have the idea of Don Zagier (1951 -), in his inaugural lecture at the University of Bonn, in this way: "There are two facts about the distribution of prime numbers, which I hope to convince you. ... The first is that, despite their simple definition and role of building blocks of natural numbers, the first ... grows like weeds among the natural numbers, which seem to obey no other law that the possibility, and no one can predict when the next one will sprout. The second fact is even more surprising, because it says exactly the opposite: that the prime numbers with stunning regularity, that there are laws for their conduct, and obey these laws with almost military precision. "Based on this idea, if I create a presumption that the order and disorder of the first is a matter of creation, then it is incompatible with my belief that all aspects and elements of the eteal universe, ie the shape of the universe (in generally known as an ideal or conceptual) is logically necessary, no setup, whose faith is disabled I can not understand. These two ideas lead me to a total of three possible conclusions in order of increasing probability. 1. Universe in a relatively unknown. However, some or all of its secrets will be discovered one day by people / s. 2 Some or all of the truths of the world are still unknown to man. Human reasoning is fundamentally wrong. 3rd The reason is defective. That is, not the thought / s or argument (not only humans, but by all types) can (right / accurately) describe at least some aspects of the cosmos. However, with the first opportunity, I decided not to continue, and so my jouey to try to understand the nature of the cosmos. [What is that I know can? The answer is "nothing". Since the fundamental principle of universal doubt: "Everything is possible" for what is believed to be 100% certain moment, because of limited mental capacity of the faithful, forbids me from even find / accept that my own existence (I think therefore I am.) absolutely (ie 100%) to create. ] - Dr Kedar Joshi, BSc MA DA DSC, Cambridge, UK. About the Author