Evolution is an old theory

Evolution is an old theory The question was, "the evolution can be proven?" Today, a question is more appropriate ", is the evolution of science" (The following is a condensed version of the chapter entitled "Genetics" in the book "Evolution: A Breakdown science", available for free at EvolutionDead.com.) For most people, science is seen as "today", a mode, updated, and perhaps even the promise of futuristic marvels. A generation that supersonic, intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM), space shuttles and sophisticated equipment can hardly be called primitive. Or? In the midst of all this state of the art, it seems that there is a theory rather primitive, but steady loss of credibility, even among those who joined her for a long time, is still convinced that many science. This theory has proved one thing beyond a shadow of doubt, even if the technology is for Star Wars sophistication, mode man is still capable of embarrassing some primitive thought. I'm talking about the "scientific" theory of evolution. If this theory is not honest misinterpretation may be the most sophisticated deception ever perpetrated on human race.The scientific concept of the origin of life on earth begins with the premise that he appeared for the first time the lives of thousands of millions of years ago with the formation of microscopic organisms from inert matter. In billions of years that followed, small organisms evolved into the largest and most complex forms of life, and became a sort another.The question is not whether this has happened. For every human being who lives in 1990, the question should be, is a possible scenario? Well, as we know today about genetics, the answer is an unequivocal no.Probably more rapid evolution at the time of its creation, more than a hundred years ago, is that almost nothing is known about genetics at the time. I am convinced that if the audience had a good understanding of genetics, random mutations and, in particular, before being presented with the theory of evolution, the theory was never taken seriously and certainly could never have accepted as legitimate science.According evolution, random mutation is presumably what led the life of the one-cell stage of its current complexity. That is to say, through a series of accidents of the recipients of random mutations, they say, simple organisms evolved over billions of years in new and more complex species.Keep in mind that for a species that has become another massive random mutations gene that have occurred throughout the history of the earth. But here is how the gene - the most important aspect of evolution - not only did not support the theory, but actually against it: the mode man is known and highly affected by random mutations, more than any prehistoric creature. Sources of random mutations has been around us for years. What are they? Carcinogenic chemicals. Cosmic rays. Sources of radioactivity, and nuclear weapons, nuclear reactors, nuclear waste, medical and x-rays. And some of these sources of random mutations have affected the mode man, even before they knew who caused his havoc.Let 's are the radiation, for example. Here is an idea of what it does:   Exposure to high doses of radiation limited to parts of the body can cause serious tissue damage and eventual necrosis.Exposure whole body a few hundred "real" (it is a real unit used to measure the effectiveness of radiation) can cause nausea initially. Then, in about a month, the person may start bleeding, anemia, fatigue, weakness, and increased risk of infection. While some may survive, others die as a result of these almost 1,000 real maladies.At, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may develop within hours of exposure. As these symptoms worsen, followed by fever, loss of fluid, severe infections and, finally, about 10,000 death.At actual dose that a worker may be exposed in a nuclear reactor accident, vomiting and diarrhea occurring all ' inside of an hour followed by a reduction of blood pressure, seizures and unconsciousness. In case of death from one to three days.Radiation may also have long-term genetic effects. Studies show that radiation can cause not only one, but a variety of different types of mutations. One effect of these   Aberrations and cancer. Cancer may occur years or even decades after exposure to radiation of the body. If the body shows no signs of cancer, there is still   possibility that cancer could appear in future generations.Some genetic diseases or other disorders that may occur in subsequent generations, as a result of random mutations include hemophilia, congenital cataract, spontaneous abortions, cystic fibrosis, color blindness, and muscular dystrophy. Other diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, asthma and schizophrenia may occur in subsequent generations, as a result of random mutations with factors.This environment was only a glimpse of the serious effects of random variations biological life. It seems that the results are almost always the same: the deterioration, destruction, and in many cases, this coincides with what death.Does evolutionists were chewing our ears over the years? For years we have heard stories about how biological life suffered billions of years of random genetic mutations. We felt as if by chance some of these changes have led to beneficial mutations. We have been hearing how these changes benefit has led to new and more complex species. However, when we see that the random genetic mutations - or any other change at random, in the case - in fact the biological life, is nothing but sickness and death. Where are all these benefits have been talking about evolutionary change? One patient has not developed or passed on to future generations a better biceps, for example, as a result of radiotherapy. Not one of the thousands of survivors of victims of bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is more developed brain, for example, as a result of exposure to radioactivity. Not one person involved in an accident at a nuclear reactor has been developed more sophisticated skin, for example, which is harder and more durable than the average. In almost all cases, the random mutations have led to chaos and destruction.Is It 'possible that mode technology has only helped disproven evolution? Evolutionists in the past have hidden behind "has billions of years," routine. Before the nuclear age may be asked to enter a time machine to see if, given the time, random mutations may cause life to evolve. But with the advent of mode technology affect the ability of random mutation of the mass in a relatively short time, as there is no need to dig into the past to see the Fallacies helped to support the development of the capacity of random mutation. The answer is right in front of us. Random mutations in the opposite result of what we were led to believe. As a result of nothing but death and disease - no improvement. What's more, the most massive and prolonged events of these mutations, the more chaos and destruction. So what would have happened to suppose a planet subjected to random mutations for billions of years? Total annihilation! When you take what we know as a fact about random mutation and try to reconstruct the scene of the alleged billions of years of history of the earth, rather than the fairytale story of evolution, you come with an image that increasingly resembles a horrible scene of a "post-Nuke" film, even if the land was already populated at this time of the alleged three million and a half years ago, as it is today, and has since been hit by billions and billions of random mutations , as we know today on the case of mutation, for the life that now probably have been virtually eliminated. With the random mutation that the great destructive force that is apparently the process that is supposed to have caused life to evolve is what would have caused in all probability, the genetic chaos that few agencies that have survived the test. Moreover, in such circumstances, "the survival of the fittest" is totally absurd. The word "together" were largely the bodies have been ravaged by the disease unless the rest, far from the best form of development. And the "fit" the survivors, many of them are gone from genetic diseases to their offspring. Even if the "adjustment" was not swept away by random mutations, their descendants are still passed the opportunity to be destroyed by hereditary genetic diseases. Then all the children of the disease once again be threatened with death, when the whole cycle started in this mutation again.Thus, after billions and billions of years of random mutations, even in the unlikely event that some genes mutated in a form which could ultimately have produced some positive changes to the body, a planet populated and would have been reduced to a few sick of living at best. The few genes benefits, even if it could have existed, it would have been so overwhelmed by the surprisingly high number of patients only the genes needed to produce a profit accidents, which has never produced any results. A body has been disposed of long before he had a millimeter of a chance to change or improve. In a sense, they resemble the planet Earth would be after a nuclear holocaust.Now, if a planet has started with a relatively small number of life forms, like the land that apparently did, how they were achieved life? I do not want to say to what extent that evolution has produced. I mean, to what extent the few agencies that have received, before being annihilated by the destructive power of random mutation? As we have seen that random mutations do in mode times, life would never have come off the ground, let alone proliferate very complex and healthy species. In all likelihood, the land has become a desolate planet long ago.The folly of evolution is also evident in more aesthetic aspects of man. How could such a quality, like the arts, abstract thinking, and appreciation of music are common features to a whole species? According to the mechanical (or pictures) of evolution, would be a great wonder if these qualities, so that meant the survival of the purely physical and biological systems that have evolved in only a fraction of the type. However, to be present - in varying degrees - in virtually all human beings? How? This should never have happened.The aesthetic existence of such human qualities as emotion, humor and intelligence can not be explained biologically, no matter how ridiculous you want. Why, for example, nature gives us a sense of 'humor? As the nature even know what the sense of 'humor was? And the sense of 'humor make the man best suited to survive? "There are millions of plants and animals without a sense of humor that has survived, of course. There are even people with no sense of 'humor that seem to survive. How was that quality does not evolve? With some 'serious thought that should be at least some' obvious that the scenario proposed by the theory of evolution does not work, and certainly could never have happened. You can also find a way for a bewildering mix developments could be accepted as science, in first place. I think that if the trend can be called science, we must be equally qualified in the science of science - the physics behind the Superman X-ray vision, the story of how the power of speech developed in Mickey Mouse and the chemical composition of Batman shark repellent spray. If the theories are to have fun, do they really fun.ABOUT LA AUTHORJosh Greenberg: A team of consultants for over two decades, the author has developed a software for organizations such as the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, AT & T, Charles Schwab, Bell Laboratories and Chase Manhattan Bank. Since 1984, the author of literary works have appeared in magazines like The New York Post, the Daily News, The Village Voice, Jewish Press and others. His articles have ranged from humor to scientific news to your site events.Visit ==> shopndrop.comGet your free book on the evolution ==> EvolutionDead.com